March 28, 2018 Meeting
Summary
-- see also the
February 28, 2018 meeting summary
1) Introductions
Norah Robinson, King County Parks – Marymoor Park
lead; Michael Hobbs, FOMP Secretary, webmaster; Glenn Eades, Eastside Audubon, neighbor;
Shane Berry,
AEG Live;
2) Cottage Rehab –
The Park Office building just north
of Clise Mansion needs some rehab. Parks will be installing an
ADA-accessible entrance on the front, with ramp. Interior work
will include removal of the fireplace, the creation of an
ADA-accessible restroom, and may include a “bump-out” to the
rear, replacing the rear entrance; kind of an enclosed porch
bay. Neither the fireplace nor the chimney are original. The
chimney removal and new roof will be installed soon; interior
work, and any possible rear extension, will come later.
3) Sound Transit
Several FOMP members, and Norah, are scheduled to attend
a March meeting to discuss mitigation wetlands required by
the project. While Laura does like using the triangle area
across Marymoor Way from the Velodrome, she would also like
to see mitigation north of Marymoor Way, when removing
wetlands from the area north of Marymoor Way. The only site
possible that would be large enough for mitigation is the NW
corner where the TOPS tennis facility might go. Another
possibility that has been raised it to piggyback the
mitigation with the Willowmoor Floodplain Restoration
project west of the slough, west of the north end of the Dog
Area. For trees, everyone wanted to make sure trees were
replaced just slightly south of the tracks where possible
(for instance along the north edge of the velodrome).
[Notes following this meeting: The various
interested parties have different rules, desires, and
priorities. But the representative from King County
Permitting had the most stringent guidelines and
requirements. She emphasized several rules that were a
surprise to many of us:
- Any mitigation site would become closed to public
use for perpetuity - a mitigation wetland may not
have trails for wildlife viewing, and would be subject
to trespass restrictions (signs, maybe fencing, to keep
people out).
- Wetland mitigation sites must be designed to
eliminate and exclude reed-canary grass. This is
usually done by creating a forest to shade out the
grass.
- To be acceptable, a mitigation site typically must
not be an "island", but must be substantially connected
to wild lands.
As a result, the "triangle" area was eliminated from
consideration. Norah and Michael both expressed dismay
at the idea of turning it into a forest patch with tall
trees that would block views. Michael also wants to
keep the openness of that general area, as the grass fields
are a major wintering site for Cackling Geese, a species of
small goose that breeds in Alaska (they look like tiny
Canada Geese, but are a separate species). The "triangle"
area would also fail the third test. Also, permanently
excluding park visitors from several acres of the park seems
very undesirable. ]
4) CIP/Project/Facilities Updates
a) Bird Loop - Gater shed built,
gator arrived. Current work going on in Snag Row. Glenn
complained about the wooden boxes along the south edge of
Fields 7-8-9, which contain rugby equipment. The boxes are
falling apart and overflowing. There is also a football
blocking dummy at the NE corner of Snag Row, that should be
cleaned up. Glenn was looking for additional work spot;
Michael suggested a joint operation with SODA to remove ivy
from along the slough trail.
b) Pet Garden – a company has
approached Parks with the idea of “running” the Pet Garden,
handling advertising, and handling all calls, etc. The
company currently provides an alternative to cremation or
burial for deceased pets. Currently, KC Parks gets very
little interest to the Pet Garden currently, and when
someone is interested, it requires a lot of staff time.
Norah would like to explore an access to the Pet Garden from
the north, with a path from Lot C along the north end of
Snag Row, and then cutting through Snag Row to the Garden.
c) Sound Transit Tree Removal Mitigation
– In addition to the mitigation wetland that will lose a
slice, the Light Rail will require removal of many trees
along SR-520. These will be mitigated within the park, to
the tune of hundreds of new trees. Norah is hoping to get
new trees planted in the Historic District, which will
require cultural resource surveys (expensive) as part of
this, as well as getting some more irrigation. Michael
reiterated a request for short trees (cherries, red
elderberry etc.) in the “heart-shaped dip” across Marymoor
Way from the “Compost Piles”. Sound Transit will also try
and replant near (but not too near) the rail line.
d) Dudley Carter Sculptures – A
couple of sculpture installations are being repaired and
should be placed somewhere within Marymoor. Norah initiated
a discussion of where. For the “thunderbirds”, Michael
expressed concern that people/children will want to climb on
them. Glenn suggested the yard of the Park Office for them.
Shane suggested that if the roundabout is built at the first
main intersection area on Marymoor Way, that would a great
spot for a bigger sculpture like “Condor”. Michael suggested
the new park entrance that will be built for Light Rail as a
place for one of the big ones, and suggested moving “Wek’Wek
and Holukmeyumko” from the Pet Garden to a more public
place, such as one of the park entrances. In fact, there are
enough of the Dudley Carter sculptures to have them at all
of the road and all of the trail accesses to Marymoor.
Our
next meeting will be on Wednesday,
April 25th, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the Art Barn
These notes do not constitute an official record of the
meeting. They may have inaccuracies and omissions. If anyone has
any complaints about the content of these notes, they should direct them to
Michael Hobbs at fomp@marymoor.org,
and he will endeavor to correct them. |